Protect your facility using a wet dust collector

Wet Dust Collection – A Cost Effective Alternative to Traditional Dust Collection Systems

Protect your facility using a wet dust collection

Throughout the metal fabrication and machining industries there is a lack of awareness about the dangers of combustible metal dusts. Many workers do not know that mixtures of steel and aluminum, titanium, magnesium and a range of other particulate can cause fires and explosions under the right conditions.

These materials are being used more in several industries including aerospace, automotive and additive manufacturing (Metal 3D printing). One of the most common questions that industrial engineers and operators ask is what combustible dust collection system should be used?

 

Why Do You Need Protection?

KSt Values of Common Dusts

It is important to understand that there are many different types of combustible dusts with different KSt and PMax values, which indicate the explosivity of any given dust sample. Companies should undergo dust testing to determine the deflagration rate of their particular dust sample.

Once a spark comes into contact with an airborne combustible dust cloud, ignition can cause a filter fire or a severe explosion in a confined space like a dust collector. This can lead to damaging the equipment and potentially harming workers in the area. To avoid a dust explosion or fire, it is vital that the correct dust collection system be selected for your application.

 

What are the Disadvantages of Dry Dust Collection?

A cartridge style or dry dust collection system is the most commonly used in industry; however, they have no inherent protection against combustible dust explosions. The cartridge filters inside the collector can catch fire and the confined nature of dust collector itself can present an explosion hazard.

In order to reduce these risks, a cartridge dust collector can be equipped with explosion-proofing, fire detection, and explosion suppression systems to mitigate combustible dust hazards. However, the list of NFPA required options to safely operate these units can be expensive.

Costly NFPA required accessories may include:

  • Explosion vent / rupture panel (To vent an explosion away from the facility)
  • Locating the dust collectors outdoors
  • Fire retardant filter media (Causes filter media to smoulder instead of burn, will not prevent combustible dust from igniting on the filters)
  • Spark arrestor (Prevents sparks from reaching and entering the collector)
  • Remote solenoid enclosure (Electrical safety)
  • Non-sparking blower wheel
  • Abort damper (To channel explosion away from collector)
  • Fire detection & suppression system (To extinguish fires)

 

What are the Alternatives?

Because of the many NFPA codes (61, 484, 652, 654, 664) which ensure that dry dust collectors are safe to collect combustible dust, installing a new collector with fire protection systems can be prohibitively expensive. However, there is another cost effective solution which does not require the same costly options to be added.

A wet type dust collector operates using water as the filtering media instead of using a solid media filter. Once combustible dust comes into contact with cascading water, the dust is immediately rendered inert and cannot catch fire.

The main difference between the two options is that wet dust collectors allow you to comply with NFPA guidelines while avoiding the expense of installing suppression and detection systems. Whenever combustible dust is present, a wet dust collector or wet downdraft table provides a cost effective and safe means to collect combustible particulate.

 

Diversitech Website


2 Comments

  • Ulf

    August 6, 2017

    Well collectors have their place, they also have some problems that must be taken care. While in operation they are safe, but if stopped issues can arise. Also, the waste generates Hydrogen. If this is allowed to accumulate there can be flash fires and gas explosion. So ensuring ventilation is essential, this must include situations like power failures. Also waste should never be kept inside. Then they have a relatively low efficiency, this may not be a problem for non-hazardous material but if there is an emission limit this might be hard to meet.

    Reply
  • Chris Cloney

    August 6, 2017

    Thanks for sharing Ulf

    You make some great points on additional considerations for both wet and dry dust collectors. Dust collectors typically have the most combustible dust fires and explosions relative to other equipment used in industry (see a summary of incidents in 2016 here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/combustible-dust-explosions-fires-north-america-2016-cloney-p-eng).

    They are also typically an integral part of the prevention strategy, so their safe use is necessary!

    Reply

Leave a Reply